Figures

Fig. 2): Experimental ion temperature profile for TFTR shot 45966 (solid line) compared to profiles predicted by the OHE model (large dashes), by the OHEm model (dashes) and by the IFS-PPPL model (dots).

Fig. 3): Experimental ion temperature profile for TFTR shot 50904 (solid line) compared to profiles predicted by the OHE model (large dashes), by the OHEm model (dashes) and by the IFS-PPPL model (dots).

Fig. 4): Experimental ion temperature profile for TFTR shot 50911 (solid line) compared to profiles predicted by the OHE model (large dashes), by the OHEm model (dashes) and by the IFS-PPPL model (dots).

Fig. 5): Experimental ion temperature profile for DIIID shot 78106 (solid line) compared to profiles predicted by the OHE model (large dashes), by the OHEm model (dashes) and by the IFS-PPPL model (dots).

Fig. 6): Experimental ion temperature profile for DIIID shot 78283 (solid line) compared to profiles predicted by the OHE model (large dashes), by the OHEm model (dashes) and by the IFS-PPPL model (dots).

Fig. 7): Experimental ion temperature profile for DIIID shot 69648 (solid line) compared to profiles predicted by the OHE model (large dashes), by the OHEm model (dashes) and by the IFS-PPPL model (dots).

Fig. 8): Experimental ion temperature profiles for Alcator C-MOD shot 26007 (solid line) compared to profiles predicted by the OHE model (large dashes), by the OHEm model (dashes) and by the IFS-PPPL model (dots).

Fig. 9): Experimental ion diffusivity profile for TFTR shot 45966 (solid line) compared to profiles predicted by the OHE model (large dashes), by the OHEm model (dashes) and by the IFS-PPPL model (dots).

Fig. 10): Experimental ion diffusivity profile for DIIID shot 69627 (solid line) compared to profiles predicted by the OHE model (large dashes), by the OHEm model (dashes) and by the IFS-PPPL model (dots).

Fig. 11): Normalized ion temperature gradient profile resulting from the simulation of TFTR shot 45966 (solid line) compared to the critical temperature gradient profile of the deuterium mode (dots) and carbon mode (dashes) instability.

Fig. 12): Normalized ion temperature gradient profile resulting from the simulation of DIIID shot 78283 (solid line) compared to the critical temperature gradient profile of the deuterium mode (dots) and carbon mode (dashes) instability.

Fig. 13): Normalized ion temperature gradient profile resulting from the simulation of DIIID shot 78106 (solid line) compared to the critical temperature gradient profile of the deuterium mode (dots) and carbon mode (dashes) instability.

Fig. 14): Ion diffusivity profiles from the deuterium (dots) and carbon (solid line) modes for DIIID shot 78283.

Fig. 15): Ion diffusivity profiles from the deuterium (dots) and carbon (solid line) modes for TFTR shot 45966.

Fig. 16): Smoothed (dots) and non-smoothed (solid line) ion diffusivity profiles from the IFS-PPPL model for DIIID shot 69648.

Fig. 17): Predicted electron temperature profiles of ITER corresponding to the IFS-PPPL model (dashed-dotted line), to the OHE model (large dashes) and to the OHEm model (dashes) for 50 MW (a) ) and 100 MW (b) ) of auxiliary input power.

Fig. 18): Predicted ion temperature profiles of ITER corresponding to the IFS-PPPL model (dashed-dotted line), to the OHE model (large dashes) and to the OHEm model (dashes) for 50 MW (a) ) and 100 MW (b) ) of auxiliary input power.